Search
Choose a style
Dark
Light
Time to read: 4 min

How one Georgia bank charter got payment firms excited

Atlanta, Georgia, USA downtown skyline at dawn.
Image: Sean Pavone | Shutterstock

Strict in scope but rich in strategic value, Georgia’s Merchant Acquirer Limited Purpose Bank charter is giving major processors a way to bypass sponsor banks and take greater control of payments infrastructure.

In 1910, Atlanta’s Peachtree Street was already home to more banks per square mile than almost anywhere in America. 

The city was a crossroads of railways, cotton trade and finance, a place where the mechanics of moving money mattered as much as the goods themselves. 

Over a century later, approximately 70% of all payment transactions in the US flow through companies with operations in Georgia, earning the state the nickname of “Transaction Alley.”

And now, from the same state capital, a legal creation once tucked away in the statute books – the Merchant Acquirer Limited Purpose Bank, or MALPB – is attracting some of the biggest names in global payments.

From footnote to front page

For more than a decade, the MALPB charter sat largely unused. 

Created in 2012, it was intended as a home for non-bank payment processors that wanted direct access to Visa and Mastercard without the cost or complexity of a full bank licence. 

Few took notice, until Fiserv became one the first to process transactions under the model in April this year, followed swiftly by approval for Stripe in July.

Governor Brian Kemp. Image Credit: Georgia.gov

“As the first-of-its-kind bank charter in the nation, this milestone also reinforces Georgia’s position as the leader in innovation when it comes to financial transactions,” said Governor Brian P. Kemp at the time of Finserv’s licence approval. 

“This groundbreaking step also enables Fiserv and other companies here in Transaction Alley to expand while keeping us the No. 1 state for processing payments.”

Under Georgia’s Rule 80-12-4, an MALPB may underwrite merchants, provide the means to authorise transactions, facilitate clearing and settlement, sponsor affiliates into card networks, and offer support services from statement generation to encryption and dispute processing. 

But unlike traditional banks, an MALPB does not take retail deposits, make loans or offer current accounts. Its remit is narrow; all under the eye of Georgia’s Department of Banking and Finance. All activity must also originate from US-based merchants with a fixed place of business in the US or its territories.

Any “incidental activities” beyond that require explicit approval from the state regulator, which has 60 days to grant, condition or deny the request.

The capital requirements are lower than for a national bank, but the operational rules are tight. Licensees must maintain a minimum of $3m in statutory capital, employ at least 50 Georgia residents, and safeguard merchant funds in accounts at federally insured institutions.

Additional requirements include the submission of a detailed business plan covering at least three years, with financial projections that show the company’s ability to execute its vision. 

Why interest is rising

Fiserv is not the first entity to obtain a Georgia MALPB charter. That honor went to Credorax, an Israeli firm, which has since been acquired.

While Credorax had difficulty gaining traction with the card brands, Fiserv is among the large merchant acquirers in the US. Mastercard has already signaled an openness to work with Fiserv directly, without the necessity of a third-party sponsor bank sitting between Fiserv and the network. 

Industry prognostication is that Visa, among others, may well follow suit.

For large acquirers, the model offers a simple but significant prize: independence from a sponsor bank. By joining card networks directly, they can reduce costs, control settlement timetables and integrate new services without relying on another institution’s infrastructure or risk appetite. 

At a time when embedded finance is becoming a competitive battleground, those advantages matter.

“Being able to disintermediate the payments ecosystem may also allow MALPBs to exercise greater discretion in processing for certain merchant verticals that banks traditionally restricted or prohibited their partners from supporting,” wrote Allison Raley and Edward Marshall, partners at Arnall Golden Gregory LLP. 

“Not only that, but the financial advantages associated with bypassing a sponsor bank could be sizable.”

Fiserv, in announcing its move, described the charter as an “enhancement of its acquiring capabilities” that would give merchants “greater speed and control over funds flow”. 

Stripe has said little publicly, but its application suggests an interest in using the structure to streamline its US acquiring operations.

Subscribe to our newsletter